A variety of published and unpublished security incidents in the last few years have driven the software industry to focus on the security of the boot process for microprocessors and embedded processors. Solutions to the problem of insecure boot processes vary enormously depending on two major inputs: whether the ‘secure boot’ solution is trying to protect the boot code itself from loss and reverse engineering, and what threat the ‘secure boot’ solution is trying to address. Continue reading
Blogroll
- (IN)Secure Magazine
- Build Security In
- Dark Reading
- DoD Anti-Tamper Executive Agent
- Government Information Security
- IBM Trust Foundry Solutions
- IEEE Security and Privacy
- Linley Chips In
- MAE Embedded Computing Report
- Military and Aerospace Electronics
- Military Embedded Systems
- NextGov
- SC Magazine
- Trusted Computing Group
- White House Cyber Security Review
- Wired Blog: Threat Level
June 2012 M T W T F S S « Jul 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Post Tags
Acalis Sentry accreditation applications audit Black Hat Boeing Boot Code certifications counterfeit credentials cyber security cyber security czar digital signature drone electronic security electronic voting electron microscope encrypted boot Encryption energy FAA FMS Gallardo hardware design exposure IBM Infineon monroe doctrine NIST PowerPC PUF root of trust SDK Secure Anchor Point secure boot secure hardware Sentry Server Smart Grid speculation Suite B supply chain supply chain security Trust trusted design UAV WSJ